This week’s insight covers TPR’s first annual funding statement under the new funding regime, TPR’s market volatility report following recent market turbulence, the roll-out of multi-employer CDC legislation this autumn and the Government’s response to the WPC’s DB schemes report.

The Pensions Regulator (TPR) round-up

AFS 2025 – the first AFS under the new funding and investment regime

TPR published its first Annual Funding Statement 2025 under the new funding and investment regime on 29 April 2025. Although it is primarily directed at schemes producing valuations with effective dates between 22 September 2024 and 21 September 2025, it is relevant to all defined benefit (DB) pension schemes as it covers important points from the new DB funding code of practice and TPR’s updated December 2024 employer covenant guidance. You can read more about the statement in our insight here.

Market oversight volatility report

On 2 May 2025, TPR published a market volatility oversight report setting out best practice for schemes in the advent of recent market volatility including the trade and geopolitical pressures caused by US trade tariffs. 

  • DB schemes – impact
    • Volatility has impacted both return-seeking and liability matching assets. The funding impact will depend on asset allocation and hedging.
    • Most DB schemes have strong technical provision funding and so should be able to ‘absorb short-term shocks’.
    • Nevertheless, trustees should remain vigilant to immediate and emerging risks, especially where employer covenant is uncertain.
  • DB schemes – best practice
    • Liquidity and cashflow: ensure short-term liquidity and cashflow needs are met, monitor liquidity buffers, and be prepared to provide additional liquidity if necessary. React appropriately to any delays to deficit repair contributions.
    • Investment strategy and risk management: make sure the investment strategy remains appropriate, engage with advisers to see if rebalancing arrangements, diversification and risk levels, pre-agreed changes, resilience to tail risks and investment strategy and market weightings need reviewing.
    • Governance and operational resilience: governance structures should be flexible enough to be able to deal with short-term market changes, especially because it is likely that the volatility will be prolonged.
    • Covenant and employer: assess how the employer might be impacted. 
    • Opportunities and funding level changes: prepare to benefit from increased funding levels, evaluate de-risking or risk transfer policies and consider how surplus release changes might impact these policies.
  • DC schemes – impact
    • News reports may well be concerning for members – trustees should take this into account when communicating with members. 
    • Those planning transition activity should monitor this appropriately.
  • DC schemes – best practice
    • Member communication: effective communication about market conditions in times of economic uncertainty is key as members are understandably concerned about the impact on their fund levels and some may consider switching funds crystallising losses or stop contributions. Members should be encouraged to obtain advice before switching funds and reminded about the importance of scam awareness.
    • Investment and risk management: monitor risks, review investment strategy with advisers including rebalancing arrangements, diversification and risk levels and appropriateness of planned transition activity.
    • Strategic oversight: identify value-enhancing investment opportunities and evolve investment strategies as appropriate.

Action: Trustees should consider whether they need to take any further action in response to recent market changes taking into account TPR’s report and liaising with advisers and the employer as necessary.

Multi-employer CDC legislation to be laid this Autumn

On 29 April 2025, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) confirmed that new regulations will be introduced this Autumn to expand Collective Defined Contribution (CDC) schemes so that they can be set up on a multi-employer basis. This will allow unconnected employers to provide pension benefits under one scheme. The press release also refers to a ‘desire to deliver’ decumulation only CDC – we understand that decumulation only CDC will follow the introduction of multi-employer CDC. 

It remains to be seen whether take-up for this new type of pension arrangement will be strong. The DWP refers to numerous interested organisations and also references Pensions Policy Institute modelling that “suggests that single employer CDCs could deliver a significantly greater average replacement rate (47%) than currently delivered through annuities (40%) with even higher benefits seen for multi-employer CDCs as longevity risks are pooled (69%).”

Government response to WPC DB schemes report

On 24 April 2025, the Government responded to the Work and Pensions Committee’s 26 March 2024 DB pension schemes report. We note the following from the response. 

  • TPR trustee register: Development of the TPR established trustee register is still ongoing.
  • Pension Protection Fund (PPF)-operated consolidator vehicle: The Government is still considering whether a PPF-operated public consolidator should be taken forward as an endgame option for those schemes that are “less attractive to commercial providers”. This is the first indication we have had since Labour took office as to its intentions on this initiative.
  • PPF surplus and compensation levels: Advice is being taken on using surplus to make changes to compensation levels, including indexation of pre-1997 benefits, with ongoing collaboration with the PPF.

Pensions dashboards round-up 

PASA toolkit for schemes with split/ multiple administrators

The Pensions Administration Standards Association (PASA) has launched a toolkit to assist schemes with split or multiple administration (such as DB schemes with AVCs) connect to pensions dashboards, noting the difficulties of connecting for such schemes and the requirements for all benefits/ providers to connect on the same date. In some cases, this will not be possible – having liaised with TPR and the Financial Conduct Authority, PASA notes their response that although the requirement remains, both will “take a pragmatic approach taking into account the potential impact on members” where all sections of a scheme cannot connect on the same date. Occupational schemes that find themselves in this position should consider whether to report the breach of law to TPR. 

PDP publishes DPIA regarding MaPS operation of dashboards architecture

The Pensions Dashboards Programme (PDP) has published a data protection impact assessment (DPIA) on the personal data processing carried out by the Money and Pensions Service (MaPS) in relation to the central digital dashboards architecture that MaPS will operate. It covers the pension finder service, consent and authorisation service and governance register elements of the architecture. A separate DPIA will be published by the PDP regarding the MoneyHelper public service pensions dashboard that will be provided by MaPS.

The Information Commissioner’s Office DPIA guidance notes that DPIAs are required where data processing is likely to result in a high risk to individuals, when data is matched or datasets are combined from different sources and is good practice for significant projects. They assist in detecting and reducing data protection risks. TPR’s Matching people with their pensions section of its initial dashboards guidance says that a DPIA ‘may’ be required when using multiple sources for data. The Connecting section refers to a DPIA being required when multiple providers are being used for dashboards compliance.

Action: Trustees of schemes in scope of dashboards should ensure that they cover off data protection as part of their dashboards project including the requirements in respect of a DPIA.

Expert pensions advice

For more information regarding the latest developments in pensions law contact an expert below or visit our pensions regulatory support page.